c# - Virtual machine vs physical machines for QA/UAT? .Net Runtime bug on VM Slices -


my department pushing me use vm slices out qa , uat testing. believe should using identical physical hardware prod.

our prod setup uses 5 high-spec servers. qa there 5 vm slices on single high-spec machine.

apart performance difference i’ve experienced .net runtime crashes on vm slices haven’t experienced on physical machines (see this: net runtime bug : .net runtime 2.0 error - event id: 1000 crashed program. caused this?)

does else have opinion on this? vm slices or on physical machines qa?

/cost isn’t issue here. correctness is.

having done considerable qa/uat work, can preferable have test machine matching hardware specs.

you can (and have) done qa/uat work on vm's , these should adequate testing. exception load/stress testing.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ASP.NET/SQL find the element ID and update database -

jquery - appear modal windows bottom -

c++ - Compiling static TagLib 1.6.3 libraries for Windows -