c# - Virtual machine vs physical machines for QA/UAT? .Net Runtime bug on VM Slices -
my department pushing me use vm slices out qa , uat testing. believe should using identical physical hardware prod.
our prod setup uses 5 high-spec servers. qa there 5 vm slices on single high-spec machine.
apart performance difference i’ve experienced .net runtime crashes on vm slices haven’t experienced on physical machines (see this: net runtime bug : .net runtime 2.0 error - event id: 1000 crashed program. caused this?)
does else have opinion on this? vm slices or on physical machines qa?
/cost isn’t issue here. correctness is.
having done considerable qa/uat work, can preferable have test machine matching hardware specs.
you can (and have) done qa/uat work on vm's , these should adequate testing. exception load/stress testing.
Comments
Post a Comment